Tom Rockmore’s Before and After Hegel: A Historical Introduction to Hegel’s Thought is a philosophically rich, historically embedded, and methodologically nuanced exploration of the philosophical currents that coalesce in the system of G.W.F. Hegel. This book transcends the narrow confines of systematic introductions, offering instead a sophisticated conceptual map that situates Hegel within the grand continuum of German idealism. By rigorously addressing the complex exchanges of philosophical ideas preceding and succeeding Hegel, Rockmore achieves a work of rare analytical precision and historical lucidity. His approach refuses reductionism: Hegel’s thought is neither a product of his biography nor a mere reaction to his intellectual milieu; it is, rather, a self-generating system in dynamic relation to historical antecedents and subsequent interpretations.
To fully appreciate Hegel, Rockmore argues, one must grapple with the philosophical landscape shaped by Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, and Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. The Hegelian system arises from a dialectical confrontation with these thinkers—a conceptual wrestling match that shapes Hegel’s own distinctive positions. Rockmore’s exposition of Kant is particularly incisive, capturing the critical philosophy’s foundational concerns with epistemology, metaphysics, and the limits of reason. Kant’s Copernican Revolution, which posits the active role of the subject in constituting the objects of knowledge, sets the stage for the idealist project. Yet, as Rockmore shows, Kant’s system is haunted by unresolved tensions—the infamous noumenon-phenomenon distinction chief among them—that provoke the radical responses of Fichte and Schelling. In Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre, we encounter a philosophy that dissolves the thing-in-itself, affirming the primacy of the self-positing subject. Schelling’s Absolute Idealism further seeks to overcome the limitations of subjective idealism, pointing toward an all-encompassing metaphysical unity.
Rockmore explicates how Hegel emerges as the synthesizer of these divergent paths. In Hegel’s thought, epistemology is no longer a discrete endeavor but becomes inseparable from a totalizing philosophical system—an Absolute Science—that comprehends reality as a self-differentiating whole. Central to Rockmore’s portrayal is Hegel’s dialectical method, which reveals the intrinsic contradictions within any given concept and propels the development of thought toward ever-higher forms of unity. The Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel’s first major work, serves as a microcosm of this dialectical journey. Rockmore’s treatment of the master-slave dialectic is a case in point: while acknowledging interpretations such as Kojève’s Marxist inflection, he remains vigilant about preserving the philosophical integrity of Hegel’s text. For Hegel, the drama of consciousness’s struggle for recognition is not reducible to socio-economic categories but is part of a larger metaphysical process.
Where Rockmore truly excels is in tracing the “after” of Hegel. The reception of Hegel’s philosophy is a history of both fidelity and fracture. The Young Hegelians, including figures like Feuerbach and Marx, appropriate and subvert Hegel’s system in the name of materialism, while Kierkegaard’s existentialist critique targets Hegel’s purportedly totalizing rationalism. Rockmore navigates these reactions with an acute sense of philosophical nuance, showing how each critique—even in its negation—remains tethered to Hegelian premises. The historical development of post-Hegelian thought thus becomes a continuation of the dialectical process itself, a testament to the generative power of Hegel’s system.
Moreover, Rockmore does not neglect the right-wing Hegelians and their theological interpretations of the system. He acknowledges the polarizing effects of Hegel’s thought: its capaciousness allows for both radical secularization and conservative orthodoxy. This bifurcation is not a failing of Hegel but a reflection of the system’s depth. Rockmore’s historical sensibility enables him to maintain a critical distance from these interpretations, assessing them not merely as deviations but as necessary evolutions within the Hegelian legacy.
In terms of contemporary relevance, Rockmore is unambiguous: Hegel’s philosophy, far from being a relic of 19th-century metaphysical excess, offers key insights into modern epistemological and metaphysical debates. The crisis of foundationalism, the challenges of relativism, and the quest for a holistic understanding of knowledge are all prefigured in Hegel’s system. Rockmore argues that Hegel’s dialectical approach, with its emphasis on the mediated and historical nature of truth, provides resources for addressing these issues in ways that Kant’s critical philosophy cannot.
Despite its brevity, Rockmore’s book does not suffer from superficiality. His writing is dense with conceptual detail and historical context, demanding from the reader a level of philosophical engagement commensurate with the subject matter. Yet his clarity of expression, combined with a judicious use of biographical and historical material, ensures that the work remains accessible to the dedicated student of philosophy. The book’s structure—moving seamlessly from the “before” to the “after” of Hegel—reinforces its central thesis: that Hegel’s thought is both a culmination of prior developments and a point of departure for future inquiry.
Before and After Hegel is an invitation to participate in the ongoing dialogue of German idealism. Rockmore’s use of philosophical analysis, historical scholarship, and methodological clarity makes this book indispensable for understanding Hegel’s place in the history of philosophy. For those who seek to comprehend the totality of Hegel’s thought—its origins, its implications, and its enduring influence—this work offers a rigorous, enlightening, and ultimately rewarding path.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment