In The Essence of Truth, Martin Heidegger offers a far-reaching reflection on the core question that runs quietly yet insistently throughout the entire tradition of Western philosophy: how should one understand truth in its fullest and most fundamental sense? His inquiry is at once a retrieval of the ancient Greek experience of ἀλήθεια—truth as unhiddenness—and a vivid demonstration of how that original insight receded in favour of the conception of truth as correctness or correspondence. Drawn from a lecture course given at the University of Freiburg in the winter semester of 1931–32, this text bears the imprint of Heidegger’s characteristic style of reading ancient philosophy in a manner that reawakens slumbering meanings. Yet it does more than simply show how Plato’s thinking marks a transition; in the detailed interpretation of Plato’s allegory of the cave and of crucial passages in the Theaetetus, Heidegger reveals that what later ages take for self-evident about truth—that truth is the correctness of propositions—is itself grounded in, and overshadowed by, a more originary unfolding of truth as the unhiddenness of beings.
The book begins by establishing the sense in which Heidegger deploys both historical reflection and philosophical rigor to re-situate Plato in the context of the ancient Greek word ἀλήθεια, which names truth not as the adequacy of thought to object but as something revealed out of hiddenness. Indeed, Heidegger distinguishes these two dimensions of truth—unhiddenness on the one hand, correctness on the other—by showing that from Homeric and Pre-Socratic thought onward, human beings experienced beings in their self-concealment, in the original sense that all that is present can still remain hidden in some essential manner. Heidegger cites Heraclitus’s insight that beings love to hide themselves, and out of that fundamental experience, the Greeks initially named truth unhiddenness, underlining that the primordial site of disclosure is always embedded in the possibility of concealment. The lectures trace how, in Plato’s thinking, this primary meaning becomes entangled with the view of truth as a propositional correspondence, and the unfolding of that entanglement reveals why Heidegger regards Plato’s work as such a pivotal node in the history of metaphysics.
Central to Heidegger’s analysis is the sustained examination of Plato’s allegory of the cave in the Republic. As the text painstakingly describes, the allegory captures an entire structure of human existence: prisoners shackled from childhood, able to see only shadows flickering on a cave wall, mistaking these shadows for the most real beings. Heidegger interprets every element of Plato’s image. He draws careful attention to the function of light, noting the distinction between the visible source (the fire) and the higher brightness (the sun) that remains hidden at first to the prisoners. By this reading, Heidegger underscores how for Plato, human Dasein exists in a set of horizons that initially confine it, both physically and intellectually, and how liberation involves a painful ascent toward a more primordial light. Heidegger interprets that ascent as far more than a simple transition from ignorance to knowledge; he regards it as a violent wrenching-away from the ordinary, a forced reorientation in which the liberated prisoner must painfully accustom himself to new forms of brightness before being able to recognize the greater beingfulness of the objects outside the cave, and only much later the sun itself, which symbolizes the idea of the good. This violence points to Heidegger’s striking concept of freedom as not mere release from bondage but a positive, demanding transformation that opens one up to genuine disclosure. The notion of freedom here is bound up with illuminating view—Heidegger’s term for how the openness of truth as unhiddenness requires an active, resolute stance in which the human being is bound to that which makes free, namely the radiant source that discloses things as they truly are.
In the course of this interpretation, Heidegger deploys his lexicon of key terms: ἀλήθεια as unhiddenness, φῶς as the light or brightness, πῦρ as the fire, and the cave as symbolic of everyday entrapment in which humans accept their habitual opinions as though they were realities in themselves. Careful attention is given to each movement: how the prisoner first takes the flickering shadows for real beings, then, upon a partial release from shackles, still clings to those shadows, and finally in a second, more decisive liberation, undergoes a far more challenging assimilation to the realm of brightness. Heidegger shows that only by truly undergoing that adaptation does the prisoner realize that what is called more unhidden is also more beingful, and that being in its most vivid sense is inseparable from freedom, light, and the capacity to see beyond one’s earlier self-evidences. Heidegger’s exegesis thereby illuminates how truth, conceived as uncovering or letting things show themselves, requires an overcoming of the initial darkness and a willingness to sustain the discomfort that arises whenever one leaves behind the complacent certainties of the cave.
Although the allegory of the cave occupies much of Heidegger’s sustained attention, the book also devotes rich interpretative effort to Plato’s Theaetetus, unveiling the nature of knowledge (ἐπιστήμη) and the phenomenon of untruth. Heidegger demonstrates that in the Theaetetus, Plato grapples with whether knowledge is sense perception, true opinion, or something else entirely. This leads Heidegger to examine how the Greeks perceived αἰσθησις (sense perception) as at once a matter of immediate contact with appearances and at the same time embedded in an understanding that goes beyond mere sensation to incorporate a relationship to being. This emphasis leads to a detailed consideration of δόξα (opinion or view), showing it as simultaneously a letting-appear and a distorting. By applying the same lens used on the allegory of the cave, Heidegger teases out the gradations between correct perception, the possibility of illusion, and the deeper question of how any proposition might come to be recognized as correct or incorrect in the first place. That leads to the problem of ψευδὴς δόξα, or false opinion, which cannot even be posed adequately if truth is only a correctness of propositions rather than a disclosure—and, correlated to that, a concealment—of beings.
The scope of the text is thereby revealed: it is not merely a specialized scholarly commentary on Plato but an ambitious questioning of the very ground on which Western philosophy rests. From the earliest recorded thought, ἀλήθεια signaled an eventful unhiddenness that intimately involved the human being’s stance toward what shows itself, and yet Plato and Aristotle, by harnessing ἀλήθεια into the context of making statements about things, gradually oriented truth around ὁμοίωσις or correspondence. Heidegger’s concern is not simply historical. His interpretation of these dialogues serves as an exemplar for how one might unearth concealed possibilities within the philosophical past so as to reawaken more primordial ways of understanding. Thus he argues that the modern obsession with truth as a matter of correct representation, with veritas as adaequatio intellectus et rei, is not a timeless given but the product of a transformation that began in ancient Greece and reached full bloom much later. By showing what was so decisive in Plato’s reworking of unhiddenness, Heidegger allows the reader to see how the entire subsequent tradition came to enthrone correctness in the seat of truth, thereby forgetting or obscuring the original sense in which to be unhidden is to stand revealed from the hidden, to appear as what one is through an interplay of presence and absence.
Particularly thought-provoking throughout the book is Heidegger’s discussion of freedom. He stresses that freedom is not merely a personal capacity to do this or that; it entails a binding to the realm of disclosure. As a result, the question of whether one remains within the shackles of the cave or ascends to a clearer, brighter domain is inseparable from whether one can step into an openness where beings show themselves more fully. The common modern notion that knowledge is passively given by the senses is thereby overturned: Heidegger insists, in harmony with Plato’s insight, that knowledge in the deep sense requires a wrestling with the claims of being, a strife to see what is more truly present, an exertion that is at once violent and illuminating. The interpretive difficulty of Plato’s texts themselves becomes a demonstration of the fact that one cannot simply read them without reorienting one’s own stance. The language of “turning-around” in the allegory is not mere metaphor; for Heidegger, it signals the existential act in which the human being must face the realm of unconcealment and, by doing so, free both beings and oneself.
The Theaetetus portion of the book takes up these elements and thrusts them further into questions about how knowledge is grounded in perception, how it might (or might not) become correct opinion, and whether that correctness is still founded in some deeper letting-through of beings. The discussion covers whether sense perception could ever be the entire source of knowing, moves through the phenomenon of memory and the similes of wax impressions and birds in an aviary, and considers how falsity arises when that essential step of binding oneself to the open dimension of being is missed. Rather than reading Plato’s dialogue as an academic puzzle, Heidegger probes at the underlying question of why the Greeks themselves were compelled to see knowledge as a dynamic interplay between that which shows itself in its immediate presence and that which must be sought by the deeper powers of thought. In so doing, he shows that Plato’s problem of ψευδὴς δόξα (false opinion) can never be fully resolved if the ground of ἀλήθεια is overlooked or reduced to the correctness of statements.
The translation by Ted Sadler, building on the German critical edition, gives careful attention to Heidegger’s philological precision and his philosophical intensity. The text, originally published as Vom Wesen der Wahrheit, carries forward Heidegger’s special concern that the reader not simply treat the Greek words as historical curiosities but rather as keys that unlock the original Greek experience of truth. In this regard, the presence of numerous quotations in Greek, accompanied by Heidegger’s meticulously explicated translations, establishes a linguistic atmosphere akin to the old philosophical schools, in which the very nuance of single terms can shift the entire orientation of a discussion. The translator’s foreword reminds us that Heidegger’s approach arises from the conviction that the philosophical tradition has allowed essential phenomena to be obscured by subsequent layering and that one must reconnect with that primal force of language in order to think them anew. It is thus no accident that, throughout these pages, the ordinary sense of light, vision, and freedom is stripped back until the deeper sense stands forth as a series of events—happening in both mind and world—where the truth in its more profound sense imposes itself.
The resulting work is one in which the concept of ἀλήθεια is reactivated, both in the full strangeness it once had for the Greeks and in the relevance it might still possess for the problems of modern thought. Heidegger insists that one cannot simply choose to define truth as correctness, if one has any inkling that beings can shine forth in a more primordial way that is never exhausted by correct propositions alone. This insight underscores why The Essence of Truth remains pivotal not only for those who want to understand Plato more thoroughly but also for anyone who seeks to probe the nature of truth itself in a fashion unencumbered by centuries of sedimented doctrines. The volume, in its close readings and wide-reaching reflections, thus serves a dual purpose: it stands as a highly detailed scholarly interpretation of seminal Platonic texts, and simultaneously as a radical call to re-examine what, in our daily conceptual world, we take for granted when we speak of truth, knowledge, and reality.
The text culminates in a reflective circling-back that shows how, for Heidegger, truth as unhiddenness, once it has receded from view, renders humanity blind to its own historical fate. By framing the final discussion around the idea of the good as the highest idea that “empowers being,” Heidegger discloses the way Plato’s own thought already held the seeds of a new emphasis on truth as correctness—an emphasis in which the highest idea, symbolized by the sun’s dazzling light, could still be integrated into a metaphysical system. But it is precisely in that systematization that the primal notion of unhiddenness yields ground, clearing the way for the tradition that would identify truth with verifiability, reference, and logic. Heidegger’s analysis points beyond that tradition to what he calls a more original commencement, not to discard the correctness dimension of truth but to retrieve and reinvigorate the dimension of ἀλήθεια that allows beings to show themselves as they are. In that sense, the entire discussion of Plato’s cave and Theaetetus becomes an urgent philosophical intervention into the present age, challenging the reader to consider how their own convictions about knowledge, science, or everyday beliefs might echo the complacency of the cave-dwellers.
This edition, by placing both lectures within their historical and philological context, offers an invaluable contribution to Heidegger’s Gesamtausgabe, clarifying a crucial moment in his engagement with ancient philosophy. Even so, it remains a text that requires more than passive consumption. Following the lead of its Platonic source, The Essence of Truth invites the reader into a searching dialogue that calls forth mental endurance and existential readiness. The density of the arguments—whether on the nature of freedom, the interplay between hiddenness and disclosure, or the connection between seeing, being, and truth—illuminates an entire horizon of inquiry. By the final pages, the effect is an unsettling transformation: one sees both Plato and the everyday concept of truth differently, with a renewed sense that what is normally dismissed as “just the given facts” may be mere shadows on the wall. The possibility of a more radical unveiling, while always precarious, stands out all the more brightly. And it is precisely that possibility—the promise that through a resolute freedom we might ascend into another clearing—that radiates from these pages, rendering Heidegger’s text a lasting provocation for those who do not want to remain complacent with the self-evident but who, instead, desire to question and thereby let the most fundamental essence of truth appear.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment