In Psychoanalysis After Freud: Memory, Mourning and Repetition, Judy Gammelgaard undertakes a deeply philosophical exploration of the lingering significance, as well as the profound transformations, of Freud’s psychoanalytic project in the aftermath of his momentous discoveries. Drawing on several of Freud’s lesser-known works, Gammelgaard positions herself at a contemporary interpretive vantage point from which she illuminates a series of continuities, displacements, and productive expansions that have shaped psychoanalysis since its earliest formulations. This book is not merely a tribute to Freud’s legacy, nor simply a historical reassessment of his concepts, but rather a conceptual apparatus inspired from clinical experience, theoretical rumination, and cultural dialogue. Within its pages, memory, mourning, and repetition emerge not as isolated phenomena but as three interlacing threads that tighten and loosen, come forth and recede, and ultimately transform the foundations of how we conceive of the human psyche. Gammelgaard’s approach invites us to consider Freud’s critical humanistic thinking—thinking that, though inevitably marked by the cultural and temporal conditions of early twentieth-century Europe, continually transcends and surpasses its own historical frame. At the same time, her reading emphasizes that this thinking remains astonishingly fertile, revolutionary in scope, and relevant to the dilemmas and mysteries of our contemporary world.
Far from confining Freud’s concepts to a clinical enclave, Gammelgaard brings them into vibrant conversation with literature, art, and cultural phenomena, revealing a cross-disciplinary elasticity that was integral to Freud’s vision from the start. She reminds us that Freud did not set out to restrict psychoanalysis to the treatment of individual suffering; rather, he ventured into border zones where scientific knowledge meets philosophical speculation, where psychology touches religion and mythology, where historical specificity encounters universal human predicaments, and where scholarship on language, biology, and archaeology struggles to comprehend the unseen logic governing inner life. In charting these movements, Gammelgaard shows us that Freud’s ideas—though emerging from a particular time and place—expanded well beyond their original boundaries. His revolutionary insights into how unconscious processes shape our reality are shown to be as relevant now as they were then. And Gammelgaard, through her own reading, brings to life a method of interpretation that dares to place Freud’s subtle formulations amid the shifting landscapes of modern knowledge, ensuring that psychoanalysis continues to renew itself.
Gammelgaard’s approach also enriches our understanding of how psychoanalysis engages with the fundamental dimensions of human existence—our fragile ties to memory, our encounter with irretrievable loss, and the repeated enactments of desire and pain that shape our psychic structures. The book highlights how, for Freud, the smallest detail—a lapse of memory, an apparently trivial dream-image, or a tiny element of a work of art—could serve as a point of departure, from which layer upon layer of meaning could be unfolded. At the limit of understanding, Freud’s exploration met an internal outland, an unknown territory as elusive as any distant frontier of external reality. Here, Gammelgaard emphasizes, Freud did not claim to invent the unconscious; he instead demonstrated how it insists on making itself visible, pressing through cracks in our rational edifice. Psychoanalysis teaches us that the psyche’s complexity, its layered structure, and the ceaseless pressure of unconscious wishes and conflicts refuse to be contained by a single explanatory model.
By re-reading Freud’s texts with a contemporary perspective and adding her own critical commentary, Gammelgaard draws a picture of the critical humanistic spirit underpinning Freud’s oeuvre. His concepts—though born in a particular cultural matrix—nonetheless exhibit an intellectual elasticity and a willingness to evolve. While rooted in long years of clinical observation, speculation, and cultural engagement, they never intended to be final doctrines. Instead, Freud’s ideas form a stepping stone, inviting further exploration into the mystery of human experience. Gammelgaard’s inquiry makes it clear that, today as much as a century ago, psychoanalysis must engage in a dialogue with new intellectual territories. It must let itself be informed by literature, philosophy, sociology, and art—by everything that enriches and complicates our understanding of human subjectivity.
Throughout the book, we encounter the interplay of memory, mourning, and repetition at the very heart of psychic life. Memory is not a stable record of past events, but a dynamic system of traces continually re-inscribed and reorganized under the influence of later experiences. Mourning emerges as an unavoidable labor of the psyche, a process of working through losses large and small, transforming pain into something potentially meaningful or even creatively generative. Repetition stands as a recurring pattern of behavior and affect, a mysterious return of the same that can signify both the psyche’s attempt at mastery and, in more severe manifestations, a compulsive re-enactment of trauma without integration or relief. Gammelgaard shows us how these three concepts remain absolutely crucial for psychoanalytic theory and technique today, illuminating the therapist’s task of guiding repetitions into remembering, and of converting the suffering of reminiscences into the painstaking yet liberating work of afterthought and interpretation.
The interlacing themes of memory, mourning, and repetition are not only theoretical constructs but lived phenomena with direct clinical relevance. Patients come to analysis suffering from the burden of memories they cannot quite articulate, from losses they have never fully mourned, and from repeated actions that seem to override conscious intent. Gammelgaard suggests that the analyst’s task is to help patients remember where they previously could only act out; to help them transform melancholic fixations into processes of mourning that restore the capacity to love; and to uncover how repetition may be turned from a sign of entrapment into an opportunity for insight and growth. In this sense, psychoanalysis is not just a set of concepts or techniques, but a deeply humanistic practice that aims at enlarging the patient’s inner space, establishing connections where once there were impasses, and narrating what was once unspeakable.
The book also draws instructive parallels to artistic and literary figures—Rilke, Proust, Joyce, Woolf—artists who, in their own explorations of memory and time, of loss and creation, have much to teach psychoanalysis. In juxtaposing Freud’s conceptual frameworks with these cultural creations, Gammelgaard demonstrates that psychoanalysis itself can be regarded as a kind of interpretive art form. Just as a poet or novelist uncovers hidden dimensions of experience, the psychoanalyst’s attentive listening and careful interpretation reveal how unconscious dynamics shape our perceptions, longings, and resistances. These encounters between psychoanalysis and culture show us that Freud’s method carries relevance well beyond the clinic. It resonates with our attempts to understand art, literature, and social phenomena, and it offers a distinctive way of reading human life as a text composed of fleeting impressions, concealed desires, unexpected recollections, and urgent repetitions.
In a world still facing the shadow of war, trauma, political instability, and cultural upheaval, Gammelgaard’s reflections reiterate the importance of Freud’s insights. The psyche, always more layered and intricate than we believe, confronts us with phenomena that challenge conventional ideas of reason, continuity, and progress. Memory, mourning, and repetition speak to aspects of our being that neither vanish nor find easy resolution. Yet, through psychoanalytic understanding, they can be comprehended, and at times transformed. Gammelgaard encourages us to see that while Freud’s concepts are products of a particular age, their adaptability and openness to reinterpretation ensure that they maintain a startling contemporary relevance. We, as readers, thus join Gammelgaard in dialoguing with Freud’s texts, appreciating their intellectual daring and their capacity to speak across time and disciplinary boundaries.
Psychoanalysis After Freud is a key meditation on the human condition, on the enigmas of memory, the necessity and pain of mourning, and the entangling repetitions that mark our lives. Gammelgaard’s scholarship shows that psychoanalysis, far from being a closed system, is an evolving discourse of thought, continually redefined and enriched by new voices, new contexts, and new questions. In bringing Freud’s legacy into conversation with the lived experience of patients, the works of poets and novelists, and the larger patterns of cultural life, she reveals psychoanalysis as a living, breathing tradition—one that continually draws its strength from the tension between knowing and not-knowing, between the visible and the concealed, between what we remember and what we must still learn to voice. Such is the delicate and enduring work of memory, mourning, and repetition, and it is precisely this work that ensures Freud’s insights remain a powerful beacon in our attempts to fathom the depths of the human mind.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment