Hubert L. Dreyfus’s Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I is an analysis of one of the most significant and challenging texts of 20th-century philosophy. Dreyfus not only engages with the core of Heidegger’s Being and Time, a work that transformed philosophical thought upon its publication in 1927, but also provides a lense through which readers can approach the dense ideas and language that Heidegger deploys. By focusing on Division I of Part One, Dreyfus sheds light on Heidegger’s concept of being-in-the-world, an original and transformative account of human existence that subverts traditional Cartesian frameworks and reconceives the relationship between self, world, and meaning.
In Being and Time, Heidegger introduced a radical departure from the dualistic legacy of Descartes, critiquing the reduction of human beings to detached, cognitive subjects and the world to a collection of discrete, knowable objects. Instead, Heidegger’s notion of being-in-the-world emphasizes the inextricable connection of the human being (its Dasein) with its environment. For Heidegger, existence is not merely a static state of being but a dynamic, situated way of being that unfolds through an active engagement with the world. Dreyfus takes up this revolutionary insight and painstakingly clarifies Heidegger’s vocabulary, which is often criticized for its complexity and apparent opacity, offering a rich interpretative commentary that bridges the gap between Heidegger’s philosophy and contemporary issues in cognitive science, phenomenology, and the philosophy of mind.
At the heart of Dreyfus’s commentary is an examination of Dasein, the term Heidegger uses to describe the unique mode of being that characterizes human existence. Unlike traditional philosophical approaches that treat humans as isolated, conscious subjects, Dreyfus elucidates Heidegger’s claim that Dasein must be understood not as a discrete individual but as a being whose very nature is constituted through its relationships with others and its embeddedness in a shared world of practices. Dreyfus navigates this terrain with clarity, avoiding the pitfalls of misinterpretation that have historically plagued readings of Heidegger, such as Sartre’s reconfiguration of Being and Time into a framework of existential subjectivity or the mistaken identification of Dasein with a purely collective entity as posited by some contemporary interpreters.
Dreyfus’s treatment of Dasein emphasizes its dual character as both a general term for the way human beings are and a reference to individual, situated persons. Through this lens, he reveals Heidegger’s strategy to dismantle the Cartesian priority of the autonomous subject and replace it with a model in which the individual’s sense of self is fundamentally shaped by shared social practices and cultural contexts. Drawing on Heidegger’s analyses of everyday activities—such as tool use, language, and interpersonal relationships—Dreyfus demonstrates how being-in-the-world is not a detached theoretical stance but a pre-reflective, practical mode of being that underlies all human understanding and activity.
Central to Dreyfus’s analysis is the concept of existence as Heidegger defines it—a self-interpreting way of being that is unique to humans. In contrast to objects, which merely “are,” humans exist in a way that entails a constant interpretation of their own being. Dreyfus makes this notion accessible by linking it to contemporary discussions of embodied cognition and skill acquisition. He draws on examples from everyday life—such as the cultural differences in child-rearing or the implicit social norms governing physical distance—to illustrate how Dasein’s understanding of itself and its world is embedded in tacit, embodied practices rather than explicit beliefs or theoretical frameworks. These examples highlight the non-cognitive, pre-reflective character of being-in-the-world, showing how human practices encode an understanding of being that is neither reducible to mental representations nor fully articulable in language.
Dreyfus also engages with the broader implications of Heidegger’s critique of traditional ontology. Heidegger’s project in Being and Time aims to uncover the pre-theoretical foundations of all human understanding, challenging the assumptions of metaphysical systems that separate subject and object or privilege abstract, universal truths over lived, situated experience. By elucidating Heidegger’s method of existential analysis, Dreyfus reveals how Being and Time provides a framework for rethinking the foundations of various disciplines, from the natural sciences to the humanities, by grounding them in the structures of Dasein’s existence.
One of the most compelling aspects of Dreyfus’s commentary is his ability to relate Heidegger’s ideas to contemporary philosophical debates. He bridges the gap between Heidegger’s existential phenomenology and modern discussions in cognitive science and philosophy of mind, particularly those concerning the nature of intentionality, the role of social practices in shaping cognition, and the embodied character of human experience. By doing so, Dreyfus not only renders Heidegger’s insights accessible to a new generation of thinkers but also demonstrates their relevance to ongoing inquiries into the nature of human understanding and the mind-world relationship.
Being-in-the-World is a vibrant philosophical work, offering a transformative vision of human existence that challenges readers to rethink their assumptions about the self, the world, and the interplay between the two. Dreyfus’s commentary is both a tribute to Heidegger’s genius and a crucial resource for navigating the formidable challenges posed by his text. With its lucid explanations, incisive examples, and deep engagement with the broader philosophical context, Dreyfus’s work stands as an indispensable companion for anyone seeking to grasp the radical implications of Being and Time and its enduring significance for philosophy and beyond.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment