The discussion between philosopher Slavoj Žižek and filmmaker Udi Aloni on the representation of war in cinema and its moral implications explores how societal taboos, ethical frameworks, and media shape the portrayal of conflict and death. By examining the treatment of war imagery, particularly in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, the speakers highlight the powerful role of platforms like Meta and Twitter in mediating public perception. The inconsistent censorship of violent content across these platforms underscores a broader ideological framework that dictates whose suffering is visible and whose is erased. This disparity in representation plays a significant role in shaping global narratives and public sentiment about war and its victims.
Udi Aloni emphasizes the privilege of discussing the Palestinian struggle in public forums despite increasing censorship. He reflects on his personal journey from optimism to despair, shaped by the ongoing systemic oppression and violence faced by Palestinians. His experiences in Jenin’s Freedom Theater and his admiration for Edward Said inform his perspective that genuine solidarity transcends boundaries of identity and ideology. Aloni’s remarks resonate with the broader theme of moral responsibility, as he critiques the international community’s failure to act against what he perceives as a genocide.
The conversation delves into the complexities of working-class politics and the surprising political choices made by marginalized groups, such as Latino immigrants supporting conservative candidates in the United States. This challenges the assumption that the working class is inherently revolutionary. Psychoanalysis is invoked as a tool to understand these contradictions, particularly through the lens of repression and the human desire for dignity. Aloni and Žižek critique the current moral landscape, contrasting compassion with dignity and addressing how systemic violence strips individuals of both.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is scrutinized through various lenses, including the psychological normalization of trauma within the Israeli Defense Forces. The use of therapy to help soldiers cope with the atrocities they commit raises profound ethical questions about how societies reconcile violence with moral identity. Aloni draws parallels to historical atrocities, arguing that such normalization mechanisms perpetuate cycles of dehumanization and brutality. He highlights the double standards in how acts of violence are framed, contrasting Israeli actions with how Palestinian resistance is portrayed.
An incident in Amsterdam involving football fans provides a microcosm of the broader conflict’s moral and political tensions. Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters’ provocative actions, including tearing down Palestinian flags, escalated into violence that was later framed by media and governments as anti-Semitic aggression. This narrative manipulation exemplifies how power structures control public discourse, using accusations of anti-Semitism to deflect criticism of Israeli policies and actions.
The speakers explore the evolution of modern capitalism, linking it to a culture of permissiveness and shamelessness that fosters destructive cycles of desire. They argue that this shift in societal values has contributed to the rise of populism, where traditional moral boundaries are abandoned in favor of performative authenticity. Žižek contends that this shamelessness undermines resistance movements by neutralizing their moral authority. He further critiques the moral implications of Israeli actions in Gaza, highlighting the voices of Holocaust survivors who have condemned the dehumanization of Palestinians.
The discussion extends to identity and systemic oppression, drawing parallels between historical anti-Semitism in Europe and the current treatment of Palestinians. Aloni critiques the complicity of Western nations, particularly Germany and the United States, in perpetuating Israeli policies through financial and political support. He frames international law as a vital tool for the oppressed, invoking the figure of Shylock as a metaphor for the pursuit of justice in a world where power often overrides morality.
Amid the ongoing violence in Gaza, the speakers stress the urgency of action. Aloni laments the paralysis of philosophical debates in the face of humanitarian crises, calling for immediate efforts to address the suffering. He reflects on historical anti-racist movements, such as those led by Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, noting that their successes were often facilitated by the presence of radical alternatives. This dynamic underscores the complexity of resistance strategies, particularly in the context of nonviolent movements like BDS, which face severe backlash despite their ethical grounding.
The psychological dimensions of guilt and trauma are explored, particularly in relation to Israeli soldiers and their actions in the conflict. Aloni’s artistic vision, which once imagined a surreal medicine to eliminate guilt, is contrasted with real advancements aimed at suppressing trauma in soldiers who commit violence. This raises questions about the moral cost of erasing guilt and the broader implications for accountability and justice.
Resistance against oppression is discussed in terms of both violent and nonviolent strategies. While international law complicates the justification of violence, the speakers argue that the oppressed have a right to resist. However, they critique how even nonviolent efforts, such as BDS and peaceful protests, are delegitimized and suppressed. This double standard reveals the challenges faced by Palestinians in asserting their rights within an international system that often marginalizes their voices.
The conversation concludes with a reflection on the decline of traditional power structures and the instability of the current political landscape. Aloni and Žižek agree that the disintegration of these systems presents both risks and opportunities. They emphasize the need for long-term strategies that address systemic injustices while recognizing the immediate urgency of humanitarian action. The discussion encapsulates the moral and political complexities of representing war, resistance, and human dignity in a world shaped by power, ideology, and media.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment