Understanding Brecht by Walter Benjamin is a seminal examination of the complex, dialectical relationship between art and political critique, presented through the lens of one of the most dynamic cultural partnerships of the 20th century—between Walter Benjamin, the philosopher and critic, and Bertolt Brecht, the playwright and poet. This volume brings together Benjamin’s essays on Brecht, offering a profound commentary on Brecht’s innovations in theatrical form, his cultural critique, and the social responsibilities he believed should underpin artistic production. Benjamin’s reflections on Brecht’s work not only trace Brecht’s development of epic theatre but engage deeply with Marxist thought, exploring the moral and aesthetic demands that crisis-ridden societies place upon the artist.
Through the concept of Verfremdungseffekt (alienation or estrangement effect), Benjamin articulates Brecht’s vision of a theatre that forces audiences to question reality rather than submit passively to representation. This effect, Benjamin argues, is not mere stylization but a method that fragments and disrupts the conventions of realism, foregrounding theatrical artifice to compel audiences to critically engage with societal structures and the constructedness of the social order. Brecht’s approach to epic theatre, with its use of devices like direct address and episodic narrative, is discussed in depth in Benjamin’s essays What is Epic Theatre? (in its two versions). Here, Benjamin provides a rigorous philosophical grounding for Brecht’s rejection of Aristotelian catharsis and the traditional tragic hero. Rather than drawing audiences into emotional identification with the protagonist, epic theatre invites them to observe, critique, and recognize the social systems shaping the narrative. Benjamin sees Brecht as working within a legacy that reimagines theatre’s social role, diverging from Romanticism and classic tragedy to form an active, politically aware space where critical thinking is cultivated as a collective act.
In addition to the essays on epic theatre, Benjamin’s close readings of Brecht’s poetry illustrate a shared commitment to a dialectical materialist perspective. Benjamin emphasizes the indivisibility of literary form and political content in Brecht’s work, showing how Brecht’s poems, often deceptively simple, encapsulate complex social critiques. Benjamin’s essays argue that Brecht’s language embodies a particular Marxist pedagogy, making the political and historical present accessible to the audience. In these poetic analyses, as in Benjamin’s reflections on Brecht’s plays like The Mother and The Threepenny Opera, the forms and functions of art emerge as battlegrounds for revolutionary thinking, where art becomes a means of societal intervention, not merely a passive reflection of it.
Benjamin’s essay The Author as Producer, also included in this volume, provides a striking theoretical foundation for the politicization of art in modernity. Here, Benjamin contends that the artist’s task is not simply to produce work within the capitalist mode but to challenge the structures of production itself, creating new ways of reading, viewing, and interpreting that foster revolutionary change. Art, therefore, is not a detached ideal but a component of the means of production, a tool that can either perpetuate or dismantle the ideologies of its age. Benjamin’s analysis transcends aesthetics to question the social relations that determine cultural production, proposing a radical rethinking of the artist’s social function.
Another highlight of this volume is the excerpt from Benjamin’s diary, Conversations with Brecht, which captures their interactions during Brecht’s Danish exile in the late 1930s. These entries reveal a unique intellectual dynamic between Benjamin, the contemplative philosopher, and Brecht, the pragmatic playwright. Through their exchanges on figures like Kafka and on the political disillusionments of the era, we witness the development of a shared dialectical pessimism, which, paradoxically, harbors a deep optimism about art’s potential to incite change. The discussions touch on the aesthetic and political challenges of representing a world darkened by fascism and Stalinist repression. While Benjamin admired Kafka’s visionary despair, Brecht viewed Kafka’s work as a critical document of the bourgeois condition under capitalism, reflecting the “bad new” conditions of modernity.
Benjamin’s and Brecht’s skepticism of conventional, linear history is another crucial theme that permeates Benjamin’s writings on Brecht. Informed by Benjamin’s thesis on the philosophy of history, this perspective suggests that the past remains alive in the present and that the unredressed sufferings of history’s “losers” demand attention from each new generation. In Brecht’s historical plays, which rewrite canonical figures and events to reveal hidden social conflicts, Benjamin sees the crystallization of a critical historical consciousness that rejects historical inevitability in favor of historical possibility, foregrounding that “things could happen differently.” This approach infuses Brecht’s drama with an element of utopianism and an acute awareness of historical contingency, prompting audiences to envision a future unbound by the errors of the past.
In understanding Brecht, Benjamin finds a blueprint for a socialist humanism that transcends dogma to engage the human capacity for resilience, adaptability, and critique. Their shared philosophy, a dialectical humanism deeply skeptical of teleological history, emerges as a vision of social transformation grounded in the exigencies of the immediate present but oriented toward a utopian future where human suffering is mitigated through collective action.
Benjamin’s volume shows Brecht’s influence and is a seminal text for scholars of aesthetics, Marxism, and modernist cultural criticism, inviting readers to reconsider the artist’s role not merely as a commentator on society but as an active participant in the struggle for justice, wielding art as both critique and catalyst for change.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment