F.R. Hansen’s The Breakdown of Capitalism: A History of the Idea in Western Marxism, 1883-1983 offers a richly layered and deeply critical examination of the complex intellectual tradition surrounding the theories of capitalism’s breakdown within Western Marxist thought. Written in 1985, Hansen’s work situates itself as both a historical study and a philosophical investigation, tracing a century of Marxist discourse that centers on the contentious and often speculative idea that capitalism, through its intrinsic contradictions, is destined for collapse. This history, beginning in the aftermath of Marx’s death and culminating in the ideological developments of the late 20th century, is reconstructed through an analysis of prominent thinkers, shifting perspectives, and the recurrent interpretative challenges faced by theorists who invoked the concept of capitalism’s demise.
The notion of capitalism’s breakdown, while ostensibly rooted in the writings of Marx, has incited varied interpretations and intense debates across generations of Western Marxist theorists. Hansen explores this evolution, highlighting the interpretative diversity, empirical challenges, and frequent shifts away from class analysis that have characterized theories of breakdown from figures like Bernstein, Luxemburg, Grossmann, and Kautsky. These theorists and their successors grappled with key passages in Capital that suggest capitalism’s inherent contradictions might one day culminate in its dissolution. Hansen reveals how, despite shared origins, these breakdown theories diverged into radically different approaches, each reflecting the intellectual, social, and political pressures of their times.
One of the book’s central insights lies in Hansen’s examination of the epistemological and historical issues that underlie these theories and inform their theoretical diversity. Each iteration of breakdown theory reflects not only a unique appropriation of Marx’s ideas but also a particular perception of capitalist reality. For instance, while Luxemburg’s model highlighted the systemic constraints of underconsumption as the basis of capitalism’s unsustainability, Grossmann’s later structural model drew on a more deterministic reading, with an emphasis on the falling rate of profit as a fatal flaw within capitalism’s economic engine. These thinkers, and the critical responses they provoked, often refracted broader ideological shifts, revealing Marxist thought as a site of ongoing struggle over the interpretation and future of capitalism.
As Hansen recounts, breakdown theories assumed a dialectical role within Marxist discourse itself, serving as symbols that catalyzed self-reflection and ideological boundary-setting. Lenin, for instance, fiercely opposed the breakdown theorists of his day, seeing their work as overly deterministic and insufficiently attuned to revolutionary potential. For Lenin and others, the framework of breakdown provided fertile ground for critiquing reformist tendencies within the Marxist movement. Through these critiques, breakdown theory helped crystallize Marxist orthodoxy and fueled the theoretical development of class struggle, even as it invited speculation about capitalism’s structural limits.
Hansen’s study interrogates why theories of breakdown have endured despite repeated empirical setbacks, continually evolving with renewed urgency even as capitalist crises seemed to defy predictions of an inevitable collapse. This persistence, he suggests, raises key questions about the social conditions and philosophical implications of theoretical work in a capitalist society. Breakdown theories, while repeatedly disproven or rendered obsolete by economic developments, persist not just because they offer predictive models, but because they address deeper anxieties and intellectual imperatives within the Marxist tradition. For Western Marxist theorists, speculations about capitalism’s breakdown have provided a crucial means of articulating discontent with existing social structures and envisioning alternatives.
Central to Hansen’s analysis is the complex relationship between empirical data and theoretical speculation in breakdown theory. Many Marxists, as Hansen illustrates, believed their analyses would align with observable economic trends, yet capitalism’s adaptive resilience has frequently disrupted this expectation. Despite this empirical incongruence, breakdown theories have shown remarkable durability, suggesting they fulfill functions beyond predictive accuracy. Hansen posits that the theories’ resilience is partially rooted in their symbolic significance, representing an intellectual space where Marxist scholars can critique and envision beyond capitalism’s status quo. This symbolic power has enabled breakdown theories to transcend empirical falsification, operating as a critique of capitalist ideology rather than a strict forecast.
Hansen further traces how Marxist theorists have continually wrestled with contradictions within Marx’s own writings. While Capital offered a complex set of concepts indicating capitalism’s inherent instability, it refrained from positing a definitive breakdown theory. This ambiguity has allowed for multiple, sometimes contradictory, interpretations of capitalism’s limits, fostering both orthodox and revisionist traditions within Marxism. Hansen identifies three distinct approaches within the breakdown discourse: an orthodox position, which emphasizes the primacy of economic forces and empirical data; a neo-orthodox position, which acknowledges structural economic forces while integrating socio-political variables; and an anti-orthodox stance, which prioritizes superstructural elements over economic determinism, often venturing into speculative or idealistic territory.
The history of breakdown theories is thus, for Hansen, a history of contestation and selective interpretation, as each generation of Marxist scholars reconfigured Marx’s work in response to their specific historical circumstances. This interpretative dynamism underscores the adaptability of Marxist thought but also reveals limitations in the way breakdown theory has traditionally been formulated. By closely analyzing the works of Luxemburg, Kautsky, Boudin, and later figures like Mandel and Habermas, Hansen reconstructs a lineage of theoretical engagements with Capital, charting how these thinkers grappled with the same fundamental issues yet arrived at divergent conclusions regarding capitalism’s future.
Hansen’s study also reflects on how breakdown theories oscillate between viewing capitalism as a mechanical system bound for collapse and recognizing it as a dynamic mode of production capable of internal reform. This duality is apparent in Marx’s discussions of economic crises, business cycles, and the contradictory effects of capital accumulation. While some theorists, influenced by Marx’s passages on the falling rate of profit, emphasized the inevitability of breakdown, others argued that crises merely represented opportunities for capitalism to reinvent itself. Hansen traces how this dichotomy has pervaded Marxist theory, revealing breakdown discourse as a site where empirical realities clash with deterministic narratives, and where class struggle occasionally gives way to the notion of automatic systemic collapse.
Throughout his analysis, Hansen underscores how breakdown theories reflect deeper methodological and philosophical tensions within Marxism, particularly regarding the epistemological status of empirical data and the role of ideology. Marx’s critiques of classical political economy, which emphasized capitalism’s inherently contradictory social relations, form a backdrop to Hansen’s exploration. He argues that breakdown theorists have often oscillated between a deterministic reading of capitalism’s laws and a recognition of the unpredictable, contingent aspects of social struggle. This oscillation, Hansen suggests, exposes a fundamental tension in Marxist thought: the desire for a scientifically grounded critique of capitalism that also allows for revolutionary agency and historical unpredictability.
Hansen’s The Breakdown of Capitalism presents breakdown theory not as a singular or static idea, but as a rich and conflicted intellectual tradition within Western Marxism. His critical reconstruction of this history invites readers to reconsider the role of theoretical work within society, particularly within capitalist structures that exert profound ideological pressure. By situating breakdown theory within the broader history of Marxist thought, Hansen’s study highlights its enduring relevance, even as capitalism continues to adapt and resist definitive predictions of collapse. For scholars and students of Marxism, history, and economic theory, this book offers a rigorous and thought-provoking account of the intricate relationship between ideology, theoretical speculation, and historical materialism.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment