In Hegel in Nürnberg: Zeugnisse der Lehre und Zeichen der Liebe 1808 bis 1816, Rolf Gröschner and Wolfgang Mölkner make an intricate exploration of the unique period during which Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel served as rector at the Egidien-Gymnasium in Nuremberg. This work is neither a mere chronological recounting nor a simple historical narrative. Instead, it serves as a close study of how Hegel’s philosophical foundations, personal relationships, and struggles with institutional constraints coalesced into a unique life experience, shaping his philosophy and pedagogy in the years between 1808 and 1816. This work moves through complex layers of Hegel’s intellectual life and personal experiences, presenting them as “testimonies of teaching” and “signs of love” that resonate through the pages, not only as historical details but as emblematic reflections of Hegel’s emerging philosophical doctrines.
Beginning with the circumstances that led Hegel to assume the role of a headmaster, the book reveals a Hegel caught between aspirations and practical necessities. The economic pressures he faced in Bamberg drove him to accept the rectorship in Nuremberg, though not without ambivalence. This role, offered to him by friend and Zentralschulrat Niethammer, came with both promise and constraint. His initial desire to secure an academic position in a university setting was unmet; Nuremberg was neither Munich nor Erlangen. This chapter in Hegel’s life is thus marked by compromise, a reality the authors portray with depth and nuance, illustrating the tension Hegel felt in accepting a role that allowed him to teach philosophy at a secondary institution rather than at the esteemed university level. The authors detail how this period of Hegel’s life became fertile ground for pedagogical reflection, with his initial skepticism about the role evolving into a dedicated pursuit to impart humanistic education at the Egidien-Gymnasium. His efforts to reshape the school curriculum, which emphasized the “philosophical preparatory sciences,” reflect his commitment to integrating speculative thought into a structured academic program that would form free, autonomous thinkers.
Gröschner and Mölkner’s examination of Hegel’s pedagogical practice reaches beyond educational theory and into philosophical inquiry. Drawing on Hegel’s own notes, dictations, and lecture materials, the authors illustrate how his teaching was deeply entwined with his conception of freedom, dialectical reason, and self-consciousness. The gymnasium became an experimental field where Hegel not only tested but also actualized the principles of dialectical reasoning. In particular, his Diktate zur Dialektik der Vernunft—dictations on the dialectic of reason—exemplify his belief that freedom is attained not through abstract theorization but through rigorous, systematic engagement with philosophical concepts. Gröschner and Mölkner present these dictations not as static lessons but as living dialogues, illuminating how Hegel’s students grappled with ideas of autonomy and self-determination, central themes in Hegel’s concept of education.
Central to this narrative is Hegel’s romantic and familial relationship with Marie von Tucher, whom he married in 1811. The authors suggest that this personal relationship offered Hegel a concrete experience of what he later called the dialectical Aufhebung—the sublation or reconciliation—of opposites within love. The marriage, described with a warmth and philosophical subtlety, serves as a reflection of Hegel’s theoretical understanding of love as a union that does not erase the individuality of each partner but rather allows each to be fulfilled in mutual recognition. Gröschner and Mölkner portray this marriage as both an intellectual and emotional sanctuary for Hegel, underscoring the deep impact it had on his exploration of intersubjective dynamics.
The book goes into the broader intellectual and cultural context of Hegel’s rectorship, particularly his interactions with contemporaries and critics. In chapters like Hegel im (Zerr-)Spiegel seiner Kritiker (Hegel in the (Distorted) Mirror of His Critics), Gröschner and Mölkner detail how Hegel’s evolving thought met with both admiration and misunderstanding. They highlight the resistance he faced from both institutional authorities and fellow philosophers, whose skepticism often stemmed from misunderstandings of Hegel’s dialectical method. The authors closely document this period of philosophical isolation and polemic, shedding light on how Hegel’s writings, lectures, and personal correspondences reveal the strain of intellectual solitude, as he was frequently misunderstood or caricatured by those unable or unwilling to engage with his system’s speculative complexity.
In the concluding segments, Gröschner and Mölkner address the philosophical and pedagogical legacy Hegel left in Nuremberg. Rather than presenting his work as a closed system, they interpret his time there as a testament to the potential of a “thinking in structures” rather than rigid systems. Hegel’s emphasis on structured thought over systematization was, according to the authors, an attempt to cultivate a mode of reasoning that embraced openness and flexibility—a trait they argue was essential to his legacy in Nuremberg. This approach reflects Hegel’s dialectical philosophy, as it recognizes that intellectual development, whether in an individual or an institution, is a process of continual transformation rather than the completion of a fixed framework.
Hegel in Nürnberg: Zeugnisse der Lehre und Zeichen der Liebe is a richly layered work, blending meticulous historical detail with a profound philosophical analysis that captures Hegel’s life as both a thinker and a man. Gröschner and Mölkner craft an engaging narrative that invites readers to not only appreciate Hegel’s intellectual legacy but also reflect on the transformative possibilities of education, love, and dialectical thought in their own lives. Through this interpretive lens, Hegel’s years in Nuremberg emerge as a vital period of intellectual and personal growth, with resonances that extend well beyond the confines of time and place.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment