Donald Phillip Verene’s Hegel’s Absolute: An Introduction to Reading the Phenomenology of Spirit is both a guidebook for new readers and an invitation for seasoned philosophers to return to one of Hegel’s most difficult works. The text carefully balances accessibility and depth, providing an interpretive lens that illuminates Hegel’s journey without over-simplifying or losing the complexity of Hegel’s original ideas. Verene’s approach is neither a traditional commentary nor an exegetical work that insists on a single interpretive path; rather, it is an introductory framework that enriches the reader’s experience of Hegel’s dialectics and encourages a personal engagement with Hegel’s vision. By presenting Hegel’s work as an “unfolding autobiography” of Spirit—a process wherein the reader is urged to walk alongside Hegel, rather than view his ideas from a distance—Verene constructs a scaffold to support a novice reader’s first steps into Hegel’s method and thought without becoming mired in theoretical jargon.
In Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel envisions the development of consciousness as a series of stages in which each position contains both truth and error, each moment builds upon the previous, and the Spirit reveals itself through a process of self-realization. Verene begins by articulating how Hegel’s notoriously dense language and use of ordinary German words (such as Geist or aufheben) defy simple translation into English. Rather than attempting to impose artificial technical definitions on Hegel’s terminology, Verene guides the reader through a nuanced engagement with Hegel’s language, emphasizing that Hegel consciously avoided technical language to ground his philosophical insights within the terms of lived experience. Verene includes a glossary of Hegelian terms, offering both German and English equivalents, to help the reader develop a working vocabulary within Hegel’s philosophical language—language that hearkens back to common, everyday usage while simultaneously stretching these words into new philosophical dimensions. This glossary also supports Verene’s thesis that Hegel’s approach to language is Socratic in its grounding within common speech, which invites readers to contemplate familiar words in deeper ways.
Verene insists that the Phenomenology cannot simply be skimmed or understood by reading summaries; each section must be wrestled with as a living part of the whole. Hegel’s work demands an active reading process that challenges the reader’s intellectual patience and openness. This patience mirrors Hegel’s own “long passage of time” required by the Spirit to traverse the different shapes of consciousness, a journey that Verene likens to Dante’s descent into the underworld. The reader is called to undergo a form of speculative thinking that not only analyzes but actively engages in a transformation of self in relation to the object of thought. Hegel’s notion of Begriff—a speculative concept that is at once self-constituting and self-transforming—is emphasized as essential to understanding his method. Verene describes how Hegel’s speculative philosophy opposes mere argumentation (raisonnement), which Hegel sees as a form of passive reasoning that lacks any true engagement or alteration of the self. Instead, the reader must learn to think dialectically, to see each “moment” as an interconnected whole, and to experience knowledge as a transformative process.
One of Verene’s key contributions is his articulation of the dialectic as an imaginative literary process. Instead of relying solely on discursive reasoning, Hegel intersperses metaphors and analogies—such as the “night in which all cows are black,” the “Bacchanalian revel,” or the “Golgotha of the Spirit”—which give life to abstract ideas and engage the reader’s imagination. For Verene, these images, which punctuate the dialectical journey, serve as starting points for the reader to explore Hegel’s ideas on their own terms. He suggests that readers first identify these root images, then uncover the questions embedded within them, and finally observe how these images direct the unfolding of Hegel’s reasoning.
In addressing the organizational structure of Hegel’s Phenomenology, Verene offers a methodological approach: each section of Hegel’s work should be read three times, each reading corresponding to the classical rhetorical principles of inventio (discovery), dispositio (arrangement), and elocutio (expression). Verene likens this repeated reading to the process of musical or poetic repetition, where deeper meanings are uncovered with each iteration. Hegel’s text, according to Verene, operates on three different levels of expression—conceptual, commonsensical, and metaphorical—each level interweaving to create a complete picture of the Spirit’s journey. This approach echoes Verene’s belief that the Phenomenology is not a closed system but an open invitation for readers to grapple with its dynamic unfolding.
Verene also explores Hegel’s position within the philosophical tradition, situating his speculative philosophy in contrast to Kantian reflection and the empirical rationalism of the time. The Preface to Phenomenology, Verene argues, is a kind of microcosm of Hegel’s entire system, presenting his fundamental critique of the limitations of reflection and the understanding (Verstand) as a means to knowledge. Here, Hegel distinguishes speculative reason (Vernunft), which grasps the unity within oppositions, as the only path to true knowledge. Verene emphasizes that this shift from reflection to speculation is essential to understanding Hegel’s vision of an organic, living philosophy—one that recognizes each concept, not as an isolated truth, but as a dialectical process bound to a larger whole. Hegel’s metaphor of the blossom becoming fruit, contrasting with the dead knowledge of anatomy, captures the vitality of speculative thinking.
As Verene navigates Hegel’s theory of consciousness and self-consciousness, he argues that these primary sections (Parts A and B) provide the reader with a grasp of the essential principles of Hegel’s philosophy. Once these foundations are understood, Verene believes the reader will be equipped to tackle the often overwhelming array of stages within Hegel’s philosophy of reason and spirit. His treatment of the later stages of religion and absolute knowing offers a place for the reader to “stand” while encountering the intricacies of these later sections. Yet Verene is careful to avoid reducing Hegel’s work to a set of conclusions or doctrines; rather, he presents these stages as moments within an ever-expanding dialectic, a forest within which individual trees can be understood in relation to the whole.
Verene positions Hegel’s work as a journey of self-knowledge, with the reader’s experience mirroring that of the Spirit in its quest for the absolute. Hegel’s Phenomenology becomes, in Verene’s hands, a philosophical odyssey where Spirit must descend into the “highway of despair” to encounter its own contradictions and emerge transformed. Verene draws from classical rhetorical principles, philosophical dialogue, and the unfolding drama of Hegel’s metaphors to craft a reading experience that calls on readers to bring their own thought to life. Verene’s work serves as a philosophical companion for readers of Hegel, offering them a steady hand on a journey that leads not only through Hegel’s philosophical text but also through the depths of their own speculative reasoning. In the end, Hegel’s Absolute invites readers to confront the dialectical movement within themselves, embodying Hegel’s vision of philosophy as an ongoing, self-transforming encounter with the absolute.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment