In Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’, Theodor W. Adorno gave us a series of lectures on Immanuel Kant’s seminal work, illuminating the philosophical areas that Kant navigated and the critical repercussions of his thought on the trajectory of modern philosophy. Through a close examination of Kant’s epistemology and metaphysics, Adorno seeks to unearth the complexities and contradictions inherent in Kant’s philosophy, particularly the dualism that characterizes his system and the “Kantian block” that arises from his aversion to the idealism posited by his successors, such as Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Adorno’s lectures are framed as an attempt to render Kant’s ideas more comprehensible to students and philosophers alike, drawing attention to the problematic aspects of Kant’s philosophy that he finds both challenging and illuminating.
Adorno’s analysis shows us that Kant’s work represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of critical thought, one that paradoxically reveals both the potential and the limitations of reason. He analyses Kant’s inquiry into the foundations of knowledge, highlighting the critical question of how synthetic a priori judgments are possible, and he scrutinizes the implications of this inquiry for the broader landscape of metaphysics and epistemology. By engaging with Kant’s method and intentions, Adorno articulates a vision of philosophy that resists the temptations of dogmatism and absolutism, advocating instead for a critical engagement with the historical context and the social realities that shape philosophical discourse.
Adorno’s interpretation of Kant is not merely expository; it serves as a conduit for his own philosophical project, as articulated in his major works, including Negative Dialectics. He critiques the static nature of Kantian dualism and insists on the necessity of dialectical thinking as a means of transcending the limitations that Kant inadvertently imposes upon himself. For Adorno, the dialectical method embodies a critical engagement with contradiction and complexity, positioning itself as a response to the unyielding binaries that Kant establishes. This dialectical approach allows Adorno to articulate a critique of Anglo-Saxon positivism and scientism, as well as to offer a close examination of existentialism, challenging the reductionist tendencies of both positions.
Through his lectures, Adorno effectively draws out the implications of Kant’s philosophy for contemporary philosophical discourse, asserting that the dialectical method provides a necessary framework for understanding the interrelations of knowledge, experience, and social context. In doing so, he underscores the relevance of Kant’s thought to the pressing issues of modernity, including the critique of instrumental reason and the implications of Enlightenment thinking for contemporary social and political thought. Adorno’s engagement with Kant reveals not only the enduring significance of Kantian philosophy but also the necessity of revisiting and reinterpreting these foundational ideas in light of contemporary challenges.
Adorno confronts the historical trajectory of philosophy, positioning Kant as a critical juncture that necessitates a reevaluation of the philosophical canon. He challenges the reductionist tendencies that often characterize interpretations of Kant, advocating for a more nuanced understanding that recognizes the interplay of subjectivity and objectivity within Kant’s framework. This call for a reevaluation is rooted in Adorno’s broader critique of metaphysical thinking, which he argues often overlooks the historical and social dimensions of knowledge production. Adorno’s insistence on the dialectical method serves as a critique of the static categories of thought that often dominate philosophical discourse, promoting a view of philosophy as a dynamic and evolving practice.
In addition to examining Kant’s epistemological inquiries, Adorno also exposes the ethical implications of Kantian philosophy, particularly as articulated in the Critique of Practical Reason. He grapples with the complexities of moral philosophy, illuminating the tensions that arise between autonomy and heteronomy, and the implications of Kant’s categorical imperative for contemporary ethical thought. By situating Kant within the broader context of critical theory, Adorno articulates a vision of moral philosophy that resists reductionism and embraces the minuscule intricacies of ethical life in modern society.
This volume is thus not only a rigorous examination of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason but also an essential contribution to the ongoing discourse in philosophy, social theory, and political thought. Adorno’s lectures provide a fertile ground for understanding the dialectical tensions within Kant’s philosophy and their implications for contemporary philosophical inquiry. Through this work, readers are invited to engage with the complexities of Kantian thought and to reflect on its enduring relevance in the face of modern challenges, making it a crucial text for students, scholars, and anyone interested in the foundations of critical theory and philosophy.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment