Philosophy and Post-Structuralist Theory by Claire Colebrook is an expansive exploration of post-structuralist theory as it emerges from the often conflicting legacies of Kantian philosophy, phenomenology, and the broader Enlightenment tradition. Colebrook’s work traces the historical development of these ideas and analyses their philosophical implications, providing a rigorous critique of contemporary thought through the lens of key figures such as Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, and Irigaray. In doing so, she raises pivotal questions that challenge the very foundations of modern critical theory: Is the transcendental project, so central to Kant and his intellectual heirs, still viable in the face of post-structuralist critiques? How do these projects, with their roots in a desire for universal rationality and autonomy, withstand the destabilizing currents of cultural studies and anti-representationalist thought?
Colebrook’s book is both an introduction to post-structuralist theory and an original and substantial contribution to ethical and critical theory in itself. She situates post-structuralism firmly within its philosophical context, demonstrating how the Enlightenment’s promises and problems have continued to shape contemporary thought. Her analysis begins with Kant’s “Copernican turn,” where the subject’s representational limits define the conditions of knowledge and autonomy. For Kant, knowledge is not an immediate grasp of reality but is mediated through the structures of representation, which define both the possibility and limits of human understanding. This turn to the subject represents a double-edged sword: it frees the subject from the impositions of external authority, allowing for the self-grounding of law and knowledge, but it also introduces a fundamental finitude and separation that precludes any direct access to the world as it is in itself.
Colebrook examines how this Kantian legacy is taken up and transformed by later thinkers, particularly within the post-structuralist tradition. Derrida, for instance, radically deconstructs the very idea of stable representation, showing how every attempt at grounding knowledge or ethics inevitably relies on a play of différance—a never-ending deferral of meaning that undermines the certainty Kant sought. Deleuze, on the other hand, reconfigures Kantian critique in a more affirmative direction, emphasizing the creative and productive capacities of thought that escape the limits imposed by representational thinking. For Deleuze, philosophy becomes an exploration of immanence and difference, rather than a search for transcendental conditions of possibility.
Foucault’s work further complicates the picture by historicizing the very concepts that Kant and his followers treated as universal. By tracing the genealogies of power, knowledge, and subjectivity, Foucault exposes the contingent and constructed nature of what had been taken as necessary truths. His critique of modernity reveals the darker side of Enlightenment rationality: the ways in which the pursuit of autonomy and self-representation can lead to new forms of domination and control, particularly through the disciplines that shape modern subjectivity.
Irigaray, adding yet another layer, interrogates the gendered assumptions underlying both Kantian and post-structuralist frameworks. She argues that the subject of Enlightenment thought is implicitly male, and that this exclusionary logic persists even in post-structuralist critiques. Her work challenges the supposed neutrality of philosophical categories, revealing how they perpetuate patriarchal structures. In doing so, she calls for a rethinking of representation and autonomy that fully accounts for sexual difference.
Colebrook’s exposition culminates in a critique of the broader cultural and philosophical implications of post-structuralism. She questions whether the project of Enlightenment—grounded in the autonomy of the subject and the universal applicability of reason—can survive in a world increasingly skeptical of grand narratives and universal claims. The rise of cultural studies and anti-representationalist thought, with their emphasis on particularity, difference, and the constructed nature of identities and truths, seems to mark a definitive break with the transcendental ambitions of the past. Yet, as Colebrook argues, these very critiques remain haunted by the Enlightenment they seek to overcome. The rejection of universal truth and the embrace of multiplicity and contingency do not escape the dilemmas posed by Kant but rather reiterate them in new forms.
In this sense, Colebrook’s book is not just a historical survey but a philosophical intervention. She shows how the post-structuralist turn, while deeply critical of Enlightenment ideals, cannot fully extricate itself from the problems those ideals pose. The tension between autonomy and heteronomy, between universalism and particularism, and between representation and the unrepresentable, continues to structure contemporary debates in ethics and critical theory. Colebrook’s work thus offers both a critique of post-structuralism and a continuation of its most challenging questions, inviting readers to rethink the possibilities of philosophy in a post-Enlightenment world.
Her engagement with these issues is both deep and wide-ranging, offering new insights into the ongoing relevance of Kantian and post-Kantian thought. Colebrook does not simply rehearse familiar arguments but pushes them into new and provocative directions, making Philosophy and Post-Structuralist Theory an essential text for anyone interested in the intersections of philosophy, critical theory, and cultural studies. The book is proof of the enduring power of philosophy, even—or especially—in a world where the very foundations of such thinking are constantly being called into question. Through her analysis, Colebrook invites us to grapple with the complexities of modernity and its aftermath, to confront the limits of our own thinking, and to imagine new possibilities for ethical and philosophical engagement in an uncertain world.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment