Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject by Simon Lumsden delves into the philosophical rift between poststructuralism and German idealism, particularly as it pertains to the understanding of subjectivity. Poststructuralists have long criticized Hegel for perpetuating problematic concepts such as the authority of reason, self-consciousness, and the knowing subject. Simon Lumsden argues that this critique stems from a misinterpretation of Hegel’s thought, heavily influenced by Heidegger’s portrayal of Hegel and Fichte as “metaphysicians of subjectivity.”
Lumsden revisits Hegel’s pivotal texts to reveal a critical yet overlooked continuity between poststructuralist thought and German idealism. Contrary to poststructuralist claims, Hegel’s conception of subjectivity transcends the metaphysical framework, aligning more closely with post-Kantian, postmetaphysical thought. This re-examination uncovers surprising affinities between the two seemingly opposing traditions, suggesting that poststructuralism’s foundational critiques might be based on an interpretative error.
The book offers a nuanced reappraisal of Hegel’s philosophy, stripping away the metaphysical weight attributed by poststructuralist readings, particularly those influenced by Heidegger. Lumsden suggests that by understanding Hegel in a new light, we can bridge the gap between German idealism and poststructuralism, fostering a productive dialogue that could reshape contemporary philosophical discourse.
Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject is both an insightful critique and a call for a reassessment of the historical and philosophical narratives that have shaped modern thought. Lumsden’s analysis provides a platform for reconciling the seemingly divergent paths of Hegelian and poststructuralist philosophies, offering a fresh perspective that encourages scholars to reconsider the relationship between reason, subjectivity, and critique in the development of modern philosophical traditions.
Simon Gros 
Leave a comment